lepsie v: http://burundi.sk/dusan/carrythatweight/images/5/51/Pzi.esej.research.txt
In 1984, in his last lectures entitled La Courage de la Verité
http://eipcp.net/transversal/1210/raunig/en
=
multiple forms of truth discourses (from antiquity)
of which three can be seen as figures of imparting knowledge:
/ existuje niekolko foriem diskurzov pravdy, z nich tri su vnimane cez poznanie (ale netyka sa poznania vsetka pravda? wp: poznanie ako prienik medzi pravdou a vierou)
* (classic) teacher
knowledge as techne, as an ability embodied in a practice.
In this mode of embodiment knowledge is owned, passed on from one to another as property, from teacher to pupil in a long chain of tradition, in a hierarchy of generations and a uniform, static order of knowledge.
a rigid striation and separation of the various techniques and disciplines.
the point is to develop a rhetorical practice that seeks conflict and transversal exchange beyond the boundaries of traditions and disciplines.
/ odovzdava sa z pokolenia na pokolenie, je to objekt, property, vec. …nie event!!!!
/ co ma za nasledok delenie na discipliny, napr na uni
/ ciel je zamerat sa na hranicne praktiky, konfliktne body, praktiky ktore sa stavaju nad hranice
* (universalist) wise man
his form of imparting only consists in being a role model, in epitomizing, exemplifying.
disregard for every kind of singularity, specificity, situativity.
/ byt stelesnenim poznania. vnutri seba. ‘ucit bytim’. ale problem je ze tiez nie je event, je to staticke. neviem odovzdat nieco na poziadanie..
* prophet, (charismatic) master-prophet
has the role of an imparter, but at the same time, he does not speak for himself, in his own name.
/ nechapem. zosobnuje poznanie, ale nehovori za seba?? hovori “we”? ako guy a pod a aktivisti v knihach?
/ foucault nema nic o chapani poznania ako eventu? (ma.. nasleduje stvrty typ)
/ toto je asi rozdiel!!!
/ prva cast bola o ‘knowledge that’, dalsia bude o knowledge as an event? nestratim sa v tom ale? nemam sa tu moc o co opriet…
delanda v new philosophy of society ani objekt as event nerozvija… mozno spekulativni realisti…
to je vnimanie objektu cez procesy, cez jeho vlastnosti ktore su v pohybe.
performing the knowledge…. knowledge production wl supplies ‘truth’, media debate enhances ‘belief’, and knowledge is being performed.
knowledge about how our world functions, in a dynamic way, what processes are inherent in the debate.
this is democracy – clash of various (incoherent) worldviews
* parrhesia, truth-speaking = “fearless speach” [rough translation], “frankness in speaking the truth”
fourth form of truth discourse that goes beyond the types of the teacher, the wise man and the prophet.
in 3 variations:
the political truth-speaking of the citizen to the majority of the assembly or the philosopher to the tyrant
/ excluded to the included?; mat prave ten jeden hlas len, voci majorite
ethical truth-speaking as test and exercise leading to care for the self and others. the questioning perfected by Socrates
socrates nie je teacher, wise man, ani prophet.
His craft consists not of teaching and imparting, but rather in a practice of calling-into-question.
Knowledge arises in the movement, which generates a differentiation, “as difference, as distance, attained contrary to general opinion and shared certaintiesâ€.
“school of the missing teacher†(“l’école du maître qui manqueâ€)
practice of the Cynics as exercising the scandal of the truth, as “philosophical activism” and as a predecessor of the revolutionary movements of the 19th and 20th century.
this one is most relevant today.
/ assange???
+ moje reci:
; knowledge production, negotiation
na bxl openvideo workshope som povedal: debaty/spory na wikipedii? to je na nej najzaujimavejsie. ostatni stichli a pozreli na mna.
this is the event of knowledge production.
We would like to understand knowledge not as a static property, an object being transmitted from one node to another,
like a file being copied. Filesharing only gives means for knowledge being produced. Participation in the discussion
One may say the actual wikipedia pages are but the detritus of the knowledge. The event of knowledge production
is metasthasised in the wikipedia discussion pages, and in the articles and books being referred to, where it is being negotiated
by the users. We should [pripomenut] that the discussion pages accomodate the private mode of conversation, when the subset
of NPOV rules haunts the discussion.
/ v tom zlyhava log – iba transmituje data, miesto aby bol knowledge production platform
/ na prednej strane prebieha akurat formalna/technicka debata, ak ide o argument tak sa debata presuva do discussion