not

[8:08:50 PM] Barbora: ahoj Dusan, mozem sa ta na nieco spytat? si na nieco na Slovensku hrdy? na co?
[8:09:10 PM] dusanson: na murgasa
[8:09:31 PM] dusanson: na ondaka
[8:09:37 PM] dusanson: na vineu
[8:09:59 PM] dusanson: na a4ku
[8:10:11 PM] Barbora: :)
[8:10:15 PM] dusanson: hm
[8:10:16 PM] dusanson: rozmyslam
[8:10:20 PM] dusanson: co este
[8:10:28 PM] Barbora: rozmyslaj
[8:10:33 PM] dusanson: na multiplace
[8:10:39 PM] dusanson: na letne dielne
[8:10:51 PM] dusanson: na hviezdoslava
[8:11:08 PM] dusanson: hm, zoznam sa uz asi blizi ku koncu )
[8:11:20 PM] dusanson: snad stefanika
[8:11:35 PM] dusanson: snad benovskeho
[8:12:34 PM] Barbora: preco si hrdy na hviezdoslava?
[8:12:43 PM] dusanson: vyborny spisovatel
[8:12:46 PM] Barbora: ale nahodou, napisal si aspon nieco
[8:12:52 PM] Barbora: ja by som ani tolko nedala
[8:13:02 PM] dusanson: to je vsetko co ma teraz napada
[8:13:07 PM] Barbora: robim si prieskum, mame urobit reklamny spot
[8:13:10 PM] dusanson: aha este na next festival
[8:13:13 PM] Barbora: na narodnu hrdost
[8:13:15 PM] Barbora: :)
[8:13:19 PM] dusanson: to su veci o ktorych sa nehanbim rozpravat ludom zvonka
[8:13:32 PM] dusanson: hrdy na narodnu hrdost znamena co?
[8:14:06 PM] Barbora: hrdy na narodnu hrdost?
[8:14:15 PM] Barbora: nie, robime spot, ktory ma byt o narodnej hrdosti
[8:14:19 PM] Barbora: narodna hrdost je produkt
[8:14:24 PM] dusanson: aha
[8:14:27 PM] Barbora: tak sa pytam
[8:14:34 PM] dusanson: akoze pre turistov?
[8:14:44 PM] Barbora: no skor pre domacich
[8:14:49 PM] Barbora: ale len ako projekt v skole
[8:14:51 PM] dusanson: reklama na slovensko pre slovakov? :)
[8:14:54 PM] Barbora: hej
[8:14:58 PM] dusanson: hha
[8:15:36 PM] dusanson: tak potom posli
[8:17:38 PM] Barbora: no jasne:)
[8:17:42 PM] Barbora: ale celkom si mi pomohol asi
[8:17:51 PM] dusanson: ziadna zena :(
[8:18:18 PM] Barbora: lebo napriklad to iste som napisala kamaratovi a ten odpisal ze nie je hrdy na nic, ale vela veci tu ma rad
[8:18:31 PM] Barbora: no … ziadna zena
[8:19:07 PM] dusanson: na ursinyho
[8:19:16 PM] Barbora: jasnee:)
[8:20:12 PM] dusanson: na fischera
[8:20:20 PM] dusanson: na zdena
[8:20:27 PM] dusanson: na tomasa straussa
[8:25:57 PM] dusanson: snad na jakubiska
[8:26:05 PM] Barbora: ou
[8:26:12 PM] Barbora: ja na perinbabu:)
[8:26:18 PM] Barbora: tu som v portugalsku ukazovala aj
[8:26:21 PM] dusanson: jj ta je pekna
[8:26:28 PM] Barbora: lebo to je zvlastna rozpravka
[8:26:29 PM] dusanson: kristove roky
[8:26:35 PM] Barbora: taka nerozpravkova
[8:26:43 PM] Barbora: hej, tie su!
[8:26:51 PM] dusanson: slnko v sieti mozno, ale si to uz moc nepamatam, mozno by sa mi to nepacilo uz…a uher neviem co dalsie robil
[8:26:56 PM] dusanson: obchod na korze ma nebavil
[8:27:36 PM] dusanson: aa na utekajme uz ide som hrdyy
[8:27:54 PM] dusanson: nadhlad a lahkost, pritom bez pretvarky

ACTA = new global IP enforcement norms

media korps razia stale cez americku administrativu free market dohody s najvacsimi ekonomikami sveta, pricom potom to bude pre mensie krajiny prekazkou v biznise ak to tiez nepodpisu… takto to chcu postupne presadit globalne… tym ze su to obchodne dohody, obidu tak narodne legislativy… hlavna vec tam vyzera byt povinny three strikes pre ICT (to je ze ak vlastnik autorskych prav trikrat upozorni ICT na nejakeho porusovatela, tak ho ten musi vypnut??), ale pise sa tam o ‘ISP’s third party liability’, cize to znamena ze to za vlastnikov prav vlastne budu musiet riesit internetovi provideri, co si bude od nich ziadat nalezite opatrenia (??) zaroven technologicke a telecom korps su samozrejme proti, ale content korps vyzeraju mat lepsi lobbing…. za amikov to riesi USTR (co je kvazi ministerstvo obchodu), dohodu chcu mat uzavretu uz dalsi rok…
dalsie kolo rokovani bude @ Mexican IP Office

—

internet provisions are all about imposing a set of copyright industry demands on the global Internet,
including obligations on ISPs to adopt Three Strikes Internet disconnection policies,
and a global expansion of DMCA-style TPM laws.

Internet provisions will go beyond existing international treaty obligations

First, according to the leaks, ACTA member countries will be required to provide for third-party (Internet Intermediary) liability. This is not required by any of the major international IP treaties – not by the 1994 Trade Related Aspects of IP agreement, nor the WIPO Copyright and WIPO Performances and Phonograms Treaty. However, US copyright owners have long sought this.

To get the benefit of the ACTA safe harbors, Internet intermediaries will need to follow notice and takedown regimes, and put in place policies to deter unauthorized storage and transmission of allegedly copyright infringing content.

First, the US government appears to be pushing for Three Strikes to be part of the new global IP enforcement regime which ACTA is intended to create – despite the fact that it has been categorically rejected by the European Parliament and by national policymakers in several ACTA negotiating countries, and has never been proposed by US legislators.

Three Strikes/ Graduated Response is the top priority of the entertainment industry.
The content industry has sought this since the European office of the Motion Picture Association began touting Three Strikes as ISP “best practice” in 2005. Indeed, the MPAA and the RIAA expressly asked for ACTA to include obligations on ISPs to adopt Three Strikes policies in their 2008 submissions to the USTR. The USTR apparently listened and agreed, disregarding the concerns raised by both the US’s major technology and telecom companies and industry associations (who dwarf the US entertainment industry), and public interest groups and libraries.

The safe harbors in the US Copyright law require ISPs to adopt and reasonably implement a policy for termination of “repeat infringers” “in appropriate circumstances”. US law currently gives ISPs considerable flexibility to determine what are “appropriate circumstances” justifying the termination of a customer’s Internet account. If the leak reports are correct, this would no longer be true. Instead, ISPs would be required to automatically terminate a customer upon a rightsholders’ repeat allegation of copyright infringement at a particular IP address.

“The Commission appears to be opening up ISPs to third party liability, even though the European Parliament has expressly said this mustn’t happen,”

Last, but by no means least. ACTA signatories will be required to adopt both civil and criminal legal sanctions for copyright owners’ technological protection measures, in line with the US-Korea (and previous) FTA obligations. They will also be required to include a ban on the act of circumvention of technological protection measures, and a ban on the manufacture, import and distribution of circumvention tools.

The Office of the USTR has chosen to negotiate ACTA as a sole executive agreement. Because of a loophole in democratic accountability on sole executive agreements, the Office of the USTR can sign off on an IP Enforcement agenda without any formal congressional involvement at all.

cau palo! by ma zaujimalo co si myslis o tomto, mozno ta to zaujme – suvisi s temou individuacie – na druhej strane sa to da tiez citat ako ezotericka literatura -)

najprv hovori o ‘flexibilnej subjektivite’, ktoru datuje od protestnych hnuti v 60s, a ktoru dnes povazuje za vsadepritomnu:

We all now have available a flexible and processual subjectivity as instituted by the counter-cultural movements; In the present, the most common destiny of flexible subjectivity and of the freedom of creation that accompanies it is not the invention of forms of expression motivated by an attention to sensations that signal the effects of the other’s existence within our resonant body. What guides us in this creation of territories for our post-Fordist flexibility is an almost hypnotic identification with the images of the world broadcast by advertising and mass culture.

[..] By offering ready-made territories to subjectivities rendered fragile by deterritorialization, these images tend to soothe their unrest, thus contributing to the deafness of their resonant body, and therefore to its invulnerability to the affects of the time that are presented within it. But that may not be the most deadly aspect of this politics of subjectivation, which instead is the very message that such images invariably convey, independently of their style or their target-public. At stake here is the idea that there exist paradises, that these are now in this world and not beyond it, and above all, that certain people have the privilege of inhabiting them. What is more, such images transmit the illusion that we could be one of these VIPs, if we simply invested all our vital energy – our desire, affect, knowledge, intellect, eroticism, imagination, action, etc. – in order to actualize these virtual worlds of signs in our own existence, through the consumption of the objects and services they propose to us.

[..] In other words, what the Western idea of a promised paradise amounts to is a refusal of life in its immanent nature as an impulse to continuous processes of creation and differentiation. In its terrestrial version, capital has replaced God in his function as keeper of the promise, and the virtue that makes us worthy of it now becomes consumption: this is what constitutes the fundamental myth of advanced capitalism.

…a potom cast co ma zaujima, kde hovori o subjektivite v post-totalitnych krajinach:

If we approach the totalitarian regimes (Latin America, Eastern Europe) not by their visible or macropolitical side, but instead by their invisible or micropolitical side, we can see that what characterizes such regimes is the pathological rigidity of the identity principle. [..] Destructively conservative, the totalitarian states go much further than a simple scorn or censorship of the expressions of the resonant body: they obstinately seek to disqualify and humiliate them, to the point where the force of creation, of which such expressions are the product, is so marked by the trauma of this vital terrorism that it finally blocks itself off, and is thereby reduced to silence.

It is not hard to imagine that the meeting of these two regimes makes up a scenario even more vulnerable to the abuses of pimping: in its penetration to totalitarian contexts, cultural capitalism took advantage of the experimental past which was exceptionally audacious and singular in many of those countries; but above all, it took advantage of the wounds inflicted on the forces of creation by the blows they had suffered. The new regime presented itself not only as the system that could welcome and institutionalize the principle of the production of subjectivity and culture by the movements of the 1960s and 70s, as had been the case in the United States and in the countries of Western Europe. In the countries under dictatorships it gained an extra power of seduction: its apparent condition as a savior come to liberate the energy of creation from its bonds, to cure it of its debilitated state, allowing it to reactivate and manifest itself again.

..cize tuzba po identifikacii s medializovanymi rajmi je v posttotalitnych krajinach este silnejsia ako na zapade ‘vdaka’ silne konzervativnej politike identity pocas diktatury..

ide len o esej, nema to tam nicim moc podlozene, ale aj tak mi to pride zaujimave.. hm… treba to brat tak ze Rolnik je (brazilska) psychoanalyticka…. (btw s Guattarim napisala knihu o mikropolitike)

http://transform.eipcp.net/transversal/1106/rolnik/en

[7:50:02 PM] babutka: mam novy terminus technikus “problém ruky do ohňa”.)
[7:50:12 PM] babutka: v suvislosti s mtp of kors
[7:50:23 PM] babutka: alebo ruky v ohni
[7:50:58 PM] dusanson: problem?
[7:51:08 PM] babutka: hej akoze problematika
[7:51:21 PM] babutka: akoze za ake veci v programe by sme dali alebo nedali ruku do ohna
[7:51:56 PM] babutka: no sak to len tak,to su tie diskutabilne zapojene oneho alebo nestihacky odsledovat
[7:53:49 PM] dusanson: vies co teraz jak uplne totalne vypukol ten youtube a tak, tak take ze ‘kvalita’, to uz je skor nadavka )
[7:53:59 PM] babutka: :)
[7:54:32 PM] babutka: ma pojem kvalita jeste co rict?
[7:54:40 PM] dusanson: ani ne
[7:54:52 PM] babutka: tak ale co potom
[7:54:57 PM] dusanson: coby
[7:55:04 PM] dusanson: ide sa dalej
[7:55:16 PM] babutka: ako to myslis teraz?
[7:55:19 PM] dusanson: neviem
[7:55:28 PM] babutka: uz som sa zlakla
[7:55:33 PM] dusanson: jak to
[7:55:43 PM] babutka: preco pises cesky?
[7:55:52 PM] babutka: dneska mi moja kolegyna zacala pisat slovensky
[7:55:56 PM] dusanson: mozebyt
[7:56:04 PM] babutka: tak dneska je nejaky jazykovy obrat
[7:56:21 PM] dusanson: ked hovorim cesky na michala, tak mi vravi ze som postihnuty